REAL PICTURE OF HIV FUNDING IN ASIAN & AFRICAN COUNTRIES-KEY POPULATION NOT RELIEFED SO HIV ON RISE -GOVERNMENT DATA APPEARS MORE DESIGNED & MANIPULATED ?
REAL PICTURE OF HIV FUNDING IN ASIAN & AFRICAN COUNTRIES-KEY POPULATION NOT RELIEFED SO HIV ON RISE -GOVERNMENT DATA ?
PROF.DRRAM ,HIV/AIDS,SEX DIS.,SEX WEAK.& ABORTION SPECIALIST
profdrram@gmail.com,+917838059592,+919832025033,DELHI –NCR,IND
HIV/ AIDS,CANCER LATEST MEDICINES AVAILABLE AT CHEAP RATE.
FOLLOW ON FACE BOOK:www.facebook.com/ramkumar
FOLLOW ON TWITTER:www.twitter.com/profdrram
Governments and donors in South East Asia,African countries have for far too long allocated a pittance in funding for community,grassroots HIV groups and service organisations while expecting them to deliver high quality representation and HIV services at scale. After more than two decades of global HIV funding the result of this strategy is crystal clear - grassroots groups led by and serving key populations for HIV rarely professionalise nor build the skilled leadership needed to deliver high quality public health services. Nor do they represent their entire communities in an effective way.
There are some notable exceptions but, in most cases, some of the most experienced and stable community HIV prevention or care groups rely on unskilled service staff and volunteers – because that is all they can afford. Those staff and volunteers never quite get the level of supervision, training and coaching they need to address the health needs of the communities they serve.At the same time, government medical services remain hostile to the key populations affected by HIV, so few of them use these service. Not surprisingly, HIV rates among these vulnerable people in these countries have continued to rise, while rates of HIV testing among them have reduced but Government Agency for political gains,world reputation and to digest international fund usually keep very low incidence and prevalence of HIV as most key populations and persons at large are not investigated as most middle upeer class donot come to Government agency,and lack of good educated staff corruptions etc prevent Government and many NGO's created to loot these foreign funds only work on papers hardly reaching to these persons.Too many people from these key populations are living with HIV but still don’t know it.
What rarely gets stated publicly is that donors walk the gauntlet when it comes to HIV and their relationship to governments. Most politicians and bureaucrats in these countries hold very negative views about the key populations affected by HIV.These groups include prisoners, people who use drugs, women and girls in sex work, same-sex attracted men and transgender people,migrating people etc.They are the undesirables – the groups that governments blame for the ruin of social morals and social values although not openly but inside this view persists so even in INDIA LGBT ARE REGARDED AS CRIMINALS AND POLICE TAKES COMMISSION BY PENALISING DRUG USERS AND COMMERCIAL SEX WORKERS.
International development donors tell us that their end-game is to ultimately withdraw from donor recipient countries, to leave better functioning health, welfare and civil society systems. When governments don’t fund adequately – and when donors let them get away with it - it’s easy for governments to accuse community-based HIV responses of being ineffective and corrupt. An example of how this works is illustrative here. The transfer of Global Fund money to grassroots groups is often late. Those groups then lose their employees cyclically and those remaining must dip in to their own savings to pay office rent and expenses. They then of course never meet the goals agreed to for their organisations.
UTIMATELY HIV POPULATION IN REAL SENSE IS NEVER BALMED AND CARED FOR INTERNATION CONFERENCE ORGANISED AND BIG PAPERS COME BUT WILL IT ALLOW WHO TO ACHIEVE XERO INFECTION BY 2030 IS A ASERIOUS QUESTION AS ALL ADVANCE MENT OF HIV CAN HELP THER PERSONS WHO CAN AFFORD MARGINALISED WILL REMAIN SUFFER AND DIE WHATEVER DATAS ARE PUBLISHED REMAINS DATA ON PAPERS. — with C P Sharma Sharma and 19 others. (4 photos)
PROF.DRRAM ,HIV/AIDS,SEX DIS.,SEX WEAK.& ABORTION SPECIALIST
profdrram@gmail.com,+917838059592,+919832025033,DELHI –NCR,IND
HIV/ AIDS,CANCER LATEST MEDICINES AVAILABLE AT CHEAP RATE.
FOLLOW ON FACE BOOK:www.facebook.com/ramkumar
FOLLOW ON TWITTER:www.twitter.com/profdrram
Governments and donors in South East Asia,African countries have for far too long allocated a pittance in funding for community,grassroots HIV groups and service organisations while expecting them to deliver high quality representation and HIV services at scale. After more than two decades of global HIV funding the result of this strategy is crystal clear - grassroots groups led by and serving key populations for HIV rarely professionalise nor build the skilled leadership needed to deliver high quality public health services. Nor do they represent their entire communities in an effective way.
There are some notable exceptions but, in most cases, some of the most experienced and stable community HIV prevention or care groups rely on unskilled service staff and volunteers – because that is all they can afford. Those staff and volunteers never quite get the level of supervision, training and coaching they need to address the health needs of the communities they serve.At the same time, government medical services remain hostile to the key populations affected by HIV, so few of them use these service. Not surprisingly, HIV rates among these vulnerable people in these countries have continued to rise, while rates of HIV testing among them have reduced but Government Agency for political gains,world reputation and to digest international fund usually keep very low incidence and prevalence of HIV as most key populations and persons at large are not investigated as most middle upeer class donot come to Government agency,and lack of good educated staff corruptions etc prevent Government and many NGO's created to loot these foreign funds only work on papers hardly reaching to these persons.Too many people from these key populations are living with HIV but still don’t know it.
What rarely gets stated publicly is that donors walk the gauntlet when it comes to HIV and their relationship to governments. Most politicians and bureaucrats in these countries hold very negative views about the key populations affected by HIV.These groups include prisoners, people who use drugs, women and girls in sex work, same-sex attracted men and transgender people,migrating people etc.They are the undesirables – the groups that governments blame for the ruin of social morals and social values although not openly but inside this view persists so even in INDIA LGBT ARE REGARDED AS CRIMINALS AND POLICE TAKES COMMISSION BY PENALISING DRUG USERS AND COMMERCIAL SEX WORKERS.
International development donors tell us that their end-game is to ultimately withdraw from donor recipient countries, to leave better functioning health, welfare and civil society systems. When governments don’t fund adequately – and when donors let them get away with it - it’s easy for governments to accuse community-based HIV responses of being ineffective and corrupt. An example of how this works is illustrative here. The transfer of Global Fund money to grassroots groups is often late. Those groups then lose their employees cyclically and those remaining must dip in to their own savings to pay office rent and expenses. They then of course never meet the goals agreed to for their organisations.
UTIMATELY HIV POPULATION IN REAL SENSE IS NEVER BALMED AND CARED FOR INTERNATION CONFERENCE ORGANISED AND BIG PAPERS COME BUT WILL IT ALLOW WHO TO ACHIEVE XERO INFECTION BY 2030 IS A ASERIOUS QUESTION AS ALL ADVANCE MENT OF HIV CAN HELP THER PERSONS WHO CAN AFFORD MARGINALISED WILL REMAIN SUFFER AND DIE WHATEVER DATAS ARE PUBLISHED REMAINS DATA ON PAPERS. — with C P Sharma Sharma and 19 others. (4 photos)
Comments
Post a Comment